This guide should contain a description of attitudes, perspectives and thought forms that probably constitute a reality that is focused on the fixing of the 'chaos' our parents have left behind. This could develop into a project that could use your input on these matters, so I welcome you to think along.
PRACTICAL USE
One of the important thought forms that seem to constitute the messages from the South African Group is that of the practical use of information. I like that concept: what is the use of all kinds of thought forms when it doesn't have any practical effect in 'real life'?
Some say that it is quite a useless effort to try and change anything in the current structures of society: everything first needs to be torn down, before anything new can start. It would be more fruitful to detach from our current civilization and move to the countryside and start a new ascending community down there, with like minded people.
Ever since I have begun to realize that it is up to me to decide which reality I want to construct, I feel more free to use my creativity to make one up. Within this reality that is taking shape I want to open up for the possibility that even within the cities there are chances for constructive change. If you accept the idea that all darkness will accumulate in the cities than you might contribute to that idea. If you however embrace the idea that the 'thought-atmosphere' can clear up if people start thinking less harmful thoughts, it doesn't really matter where people live. I don't think that city life by definition is something that clashes with an ascending world.
RECONSTRUCTURING SOCIETY
So, how to reconstructure a society within an ascending paradigm? Well, I definitely don't believe in going to the barricades or enter politics. I prefer to use another method, the silent one. If it would indeed be true that you could alter your reality by changing your thoughts, and your thoughts would increase in power the further you move towards harmlessness, the simple act of transforming your own reality would have an effect on the shared reality. It would make it easier for other people to tune into certain thought forms that I consider less harmful. Ofcourse this is all quite subjective and perhaps the thoughts that make up my idea of a harmless reality are quite harmful for others, but I have to start off with something.
Another way to influence matters is by offering alternatives for rather harmful thoughtforms. These however should be given only without starting a fierce discussion. If the differences between certain reality perspectives are too big, then they cannot be forcefully bridged.
Something could change in the way we deal with children: it would be nice if children were given alternatives for many of the deeply rooted habits that make up our reality. Instead of indoctrinating children in the job-related identification trap with questions like 'What do you want to become when you're grown up?' we could start asking different questions, like: "What kind of reality do you want to create?" or "Where would you like to invest your creativity in?", "What do you think is important in life?", "What brings you joy?"
DREAM REVIVAL
Children and adolescents often have a certain power and an idealistic perspective on the world. They may feel as if the world is their oyster. But somehow this dreamful vision dies off when people grow up. Probably because of the numbing effects of repetitive weeks which are mainly filled with work and stress.
How to sustain this positive perspective on the future within youngsters? What else could motivate young people besides the perspective of a well-paid job or the ideal of a cozy family life? Could young people become motivated to contribute to a complete silent revolution which would alter society and fix the numbing effects of the habits of those who made society the way she is?
So, what kind of words could attract children to start working on the fixing of our world? I'm going to give it a try:
TEMPORARY CONCLUSION
This page was meant as a starting point for further inquiries into this subject of reconstructing society in a harmless way. By realizing ourselves which thought patterns are harmful we can learn to stop feeding these thought patterns to our children, or the people around us in general. By constantly questioning the harmful grade of certain thoughts we can start diminishing their possible harmful effect on ourselves (and others).
I don't think many children will fall for ideas like 'ascension temples', 'forgive without understanding what you forgive' and 'pendulum who attacked you where a few times a day'. I guess children need other ways to become stimulated. The question remains: who can tell for sure that the ascension method is not just another example of indoctrination? Wouldn't the idea of 'reconstruction society' be more of a wish for us, than for those who are still young?
For now I want to continue with making preperations for this 'book of guidelines' for those who answered positively to one of the questions above and who are willing to invest a segment of their energy into it.
So much for now,
Gibbon
June 2007