|
Norsemen in the Low Countries |
![]() |
|
In the ninth century the Dutch coastal areas in the present Netherlands were defended by Danish rulers against invading pirates on behalf of the Carolingian kings. The Franks themselves were hardly able to protect these regions 'because they were inaccessible for an army on account of countless courses of different streams and impenetrable swamps' (1). That is why they seeked cooperation with Danish exiles, who earlier showed their skill to fight in areas abounding in water, using longships of the Nordic type. However one can ask whether Frisian ships were more suitable in stead of their own longships during their long stay in Frisia. The latter, having a deep keel, were rather inconvenient to penetrate the Frisian mud-flats and coastal lagoons. Moreover it is questionable if they had sufficient ships at their disposal all the time. That is why the Danish rulers had to make use of the locally built waddenschip, the Frisian cog, a ship that was completely adapted to the local circumstances. |
![]() |
![]() |
In the High Middle Ages the cog was a popular cargo vessel in the Frisian coastal waters. But finds of this ship, that can be dated before the twelfth century, are lacking. When we look for its Early Medieval roots we have to take other clues into consideration, as can be found in iconographical and etymological sources. Therefore we follow the trail of the Frisian merchants with their cogs to Scandinavia. Then we return with Danish exiles back to the Frisian coasts where they created a defence organization based on the local cogs.
The origin of the cog |
![]() |
rivet with rivet-plate of the Nordic type (from Dorestad - northern harbour) |
![]() |
bent 'cog' nail (from Dorestad - northern harbour) |
| Early cogs rather seem to have developed from a Celto-Roman pram-tradition than that they were inspired by Nordic influence (3). Roman ships of the Zwammerdam-type, found in the Netherlands, had sides with overlapping strakes, secured with iron nails. The nails were bent twice, just like we can find at later cogs (4). Nails of Nordic vessels were on the contrary riveted, that is clenched by hammering out the point. The earliest known cogs outside Denmark were found in the Zuyder Zee polders in the Netherlands and are dated in the first half of the thirteenth century. |
![]() ![]() two coins both from Birka, grave 526 (Malmer, 1966) |
On coins from the Frankish emporia Dorestad and Quentovic, minted during the reign of Charlemagne and Louis the
Pious, crescent-shaped ships are depicted. According to Ellmers we can recognize hulk-like vessels (5). Apparently the hulk was regarded as
representative for those trading towns, this cargo ship must have been the most important 'money-maker'. None of the depicted ships on the coins from Dorestad and Quentovic displays any similarity with cog-like vessels. For them we must not search in Frisia or any place in the Frankish empire, but strange enough in Birka in Sweden. Among many burial goods a couple of dozen bracteats were found in graves from the ninth century (6). Apart from pure imitations, some specimen were inspired by the mentioned coins from Dorestad, but with completely different ships. Next to typical Nordic ships, with curved stems and a row of shields alongside, we can find another type with a flat bottom and high, steep stems. Mainly based on these characteristics Ellmers argued that we are dealing with Frisian cogs (7). These coines can be dated in the first decades of the ninth century (8). According to Ellmers (9) the depicted (proto-) cogs make it clear that the coining could not have taken place without Frisian influence and thus must be located in Haithabu (Hedeby) rather than Birka, because Haithabu was the main emporium in the border zone between Danes, Slaves, Frisians and Saxons. Here Frisian merchants had there own 'trading-quarter' ever since the eighth century (10). Therefore it is well possible that these coins were struck by Frisians. It is not likely that Danes should have depicted a Frisian ship on their coins, considering the special cultural meaning of Nordic shipbuilding. |
|
Everywhere in the Frisian and Lower Saxon coastal areas the toponym Kaag, Koog or compositions of these names
frequently occur, originally meaning the coastal plane flooded by the tides. The relation with the cog (in Dutch: kogge), specially built to function
in these tidal areas, is evident and indicates the Frisian origin of the cog. They must have been very suitable for the (coastal) route to Denmark
and could very well function in the tidal harbours of Ribe and Hollingstedt. Through Haithabu the cog must have spread into the Baltic Sea
and developed into the well-known Hanseatic ship. In the process many Nordic details, like the T-keel, were adapted (11). Because of its greater
cargo capacity and its relatively simple construction it repressed the Nordic ship type. Along the Blekinge coast, in the south of Sweden, various toponyms occur that refer to cogs (12). It is not known if they already existed before the Hanseatic period. However this is certainly the case with the Kugghamn (13), a bay near the trading-place of Birka. This bay must have been named after the cogs of the Frisian merchants, who frequently aimed at this harbour.
Naval cog organization |
![]() |
|
This text is a shortened reproduction of a paper (in Dutch): 'Deense heersers en de Friese kogge in de vroege Middeleeuwen', published in two parts in: Spiegel der Zeilvaart 31-9 (2007), 25-29, resp. 31-10 (2007), 35-39. | It is well conceivable that under constant pressure of piracy some sort of organized naval coast guard already was created in the migration period, with a fleet of free Germanic peasants patrolling in the summer season. This organization can not have shown much variation along the Frisian and Danish coasts, if one considers the tight historical ties between the Frisians and the Danes. It is well possible that an organization was established, that later was employed by different rulers for their own purposes. Rulers, while they centralized their power, took over the defensive organization of the peasants (militia) and amplified it to a general military duty (expeditio). That happened in Scandinavia where powerful kings spread their power over a large area (17). We may assume that the leidang (leiðangr) was introduced in this way by local rulers and later taken over by the kings who were supported by these local rulers as an expeditio. |
![]() Bronze brooch of a stylized war-ship, discovered in a grave at Lillevang on the Isle of Bornholm |
| Danish rulers in Frisia Finally Danish rulers and not the Carolingian kings forced the Frisians to use their cogs, by shaping the existing militia for their purposes. Apparently they must have had sufficient authority to impose this obligation to the local population. In Frisia one Danish ruler, Hrœrekr (Roric), was particularly active for about 25 years, except for some interruptions. He most likely was responsible for moulding the existing coastal defence into an organization to suit his own aims. Initially Hrœrekr must have entered the Frisian waters with Nordic longships. But these ships were not very suitable for these waters. Although this kind of ships had only a shallow draught, there was a considerable chance that they would run aground in shallow water with their prominent keel. Indeed the recorded targets of Viking raids in the Low Countries were all accessible through the big rivers. As defender of the Frisian coastal area, but especially as ruler over the Frisian population, Hrœrekr also had to penetrate those places that were only accessible through shallow lagoons and tidal channels. For that purpose he had to look for a type of ship that was better adapted to the Frisian waters than his longships. He anyway needed new ships, for it will not have lasted long before a part of his retinue of exiles and outlaws stood out to sea seeking glory and plunder. And while doing this they must have taken the required ships. Therefore it is presumable that Hrœrekr employed local Frisian shipwrights. They could build a type of ship in their own tradition, the cog, that was fully adapted to the circumstances of the shallow Frisian tidal waters (18). After a the majority of his men left for England, Hrœrekr possibly kept some longships by means of strategic backup. He could not rely on the cog-organization any more. Surely after the inhabitants who had to serve cog-duty - they were called Cokingi (19) - revolted against this widely interpreted defence duty. In spite of the fall of the Danish lordship and the reduction of the central Frankish authority the cog alliances survived and stayed a defensive organization for a long time after. Only with the introduction of the counts of Holland the ship duty was annexed and transformed into a general military duty (expeditio). |
![]() the region where Hrœrekr ruled in the Low Countries is indicated in orange |
|
The presence of Norsemen did not left a trace behind of naval districts outside Frisia, also not in regions like the English Danelaw and
Normandy. In England before the Norman invasion the maritime duty was admittedly organized in districts. But differently from Frisia those districts were based on unities, the hides (20), with a more common administrative character. A general military duty, with a milition of free farmers, did occur much earlier than the time of the Danish colonization. It appears that the maritime duty was fitted in the already existing model. Moreover all duties based on hides only occurred outside the Danelaw (21). In Normandy several laws have come down to us, but a naval duty based on a Nordic model is unknown. The magnates - the tenants and the clergymen of William the Conqueror - provided the necessary ships and armed warriors for the Battle of Hastings in a feudal manner. Not in England or Normandy, without a maritime background worth mentioning in the Early Middle Ages, but in Frisia where the population, like in Scandinavia, for a long time was familiar with navigation, a ship duty could be fitted in successfully. In an area abounding in water like Frisia a maritime defence was the most logic. Danish rulers could employ the Frisian cog to their benefit. It is no coincident that the organization was named after this ship.
|
![]() Nordic ship, from Tønsberg, Vestfold, Norway (Vestfold Fylkesmuseum, no. TG 2509) |
|
(1) Regino, see Rau, 1960, 268-270 (2) Crumlin-Pedersen, 1965 (3) Bill, 2003, 11 (4) Bill, 2003, 12 (5) Ellmers, 1972, 59 (6) Malmer, 1966, 60 (7) Ellmers, 1972, 64ff. (8) Malmer, 1966, 60 (9) Ellmers, 1972, 72 (10) The so-called Südsiedlung, Lebecq, 86-88 (11) Ellmers, 1972, 72-73 (12) It concerns the toponyms Koggaskärsbåde, Kuggaskär, Kuggaviken, Kuggeboda, Kuggen and Kuggskär (13) Arbman, 1961, 40 (14) in Almere regalis decima census qui vocatur cogsculd, in the list of properties of the church of Saint Martins in Utrecht, see Muller & Bouman, 1920, no. 49 (15) Muller & Bouman, 1920, no. 111, from 948 and no. 113, probably from 949 (16) Hákonar sögu góða (the Saga of Håkon the Good), see Jóhnsson, 1911, 82-83 (17) Bjørkvik, 1970 (18) The finding of a different type of rivets according to the local tradition in Viking-settlements in Russia also makes the use of locally constructed ships possible (Bill, 1997, 200) (19) AB 867, see Rau, 1958, 166 (20) A hide is a certain amount of arable land. (21) Cam, 1944, 94 |
|
Arbman, H., The Vikings (London 1961) Bill, J., 'Ships and seamanship', Sawyer, P. (ed.), The Oxford illustrated history of the Vikings (Oxford/New York 1997), 182-201 Bill, J., 'Schiffe als Transportmittel im nordeuropäischen Raum', Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Archäologie des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit 14 (2003), 9-19 Bjørkvik, H., 'Skipreide', Kulturhistorisk leksikon for nordisk middelalder 15 (Copenhagen 1970), 546-551 Cam, H.M., Liberties and Communities in Medieval England (Cambridge 1944) Crumlin-Pedersen, O., 'Cog-Kogge-Kaag, Trœk af en frisisk skibstypes historie', Handels- og Søfartsmuseets Årbog 1965 (Helsingör 1965), 81-144 Ellmers, D., Frühmittelalterliche Handelsschiffahrt in Mittel- und Nordeuropa (Neumünster 1972) Jóhnsson, F. (ed.), Snorri Sturluson Heimskringla, Nóregs konunga sogur (Copenhagen 1911) Lebecq, S., Marchands et navigateurs Frisons du haut moyen age (Lille, without year) Lund, N., 'Is leidang a Nordic or a European phenomenon?', Nørgård Jørgensen, A. & Clausen, B.L. (eds.), Military Aspects of Scandinavian Society In a European Perspective AD. 1-1300 (Copenhagen 1997), 195-199. Malmer, B., Nordiska mynt före år 1000 (Bonn/Lund 1966) Muller Fz., S. & Bouman, A.C., (eds.), Oorkondenboek van het Sticht Utrecht tot 1301 I (Utrecht 1920) Rau, R. (ed.), 'Annales Bertiniani', Quellen zur karolingischen Reichsgeschichte II (Darmstadt 1958), 11-287 Rau, R. (ed.), 'Reginonis Prumensis Chronica', Quellen zur karolingischen Reichsgeschichte III (Darmstadt 1960), 180-319 |
![]() |
|
|