| General | |||
| Navigability 15 points | Eloquence 20 points | Lay-out 15 points | Colours 5 points |
|
Working Links Working Buttons
All or either: |
Language is very important Spelling (fortunately for you, English is not my native tongue).
Style If the page is based on one single theme, it's a pro. |
Sober lay-out. Clear presence Easy to read Not cluttered with screens, pictures, banners and words. A person can only deal with so much information at a glance Not too graphic intensive, please. Grapics: thumbnail to select from or as part of text are considered a plus. |
Pleasing to the eye Unless screaming colors are part of the page' theme, they are a con |
| Concept / Content 20 points | HTML-programming 15 points | ||
|
Content is very important to DVG AP: Sites based on one single theme can offer more information on the subject, making them more interesting than pages dealing with the subject on a superficial level. Sites that offer in-depth information get a plus. Free speech is important: every peron has the right to say what he/she wants to say. When a site proclaims support or charity, that's a pro. Politics, however, are only a pro if they agree with DVG's personal believes (I am sorry) |
Dosed and efficient use of programming In tune with the concept is considered a plus! i.e. regular html programming, javascript, dhtml, flash, interactivity etc. etc. etc. |
||
| Other critera 10 points | |||
|
This is the subjective section of the criteria used in the DVG AP. As the program is
operated by one single person we can easily say, very
subjective, heh heh heh. If a particular sites proclaims ideas I don't agree with, the application will be dismissed with an explanation why. When a request hasn't offered DVG AP with all the necessary data, the page will not be reviewed.
Sites that solely use popular street lingo: don't bother applying |
|||
|
By all means, check this out: |
|||